The Political Vision of Communist Manifesto Essay

The semipolitical Vision of Communist Manifesto - Essay ExampleMarx does give credit to the contemporary Industrial change to bring into existence a humanity market, aided and bolstered by the occupation of new colonies by the imperialist forces. This Industrial Revolution has certainly led to progress and development in a scientific, commercial and communicatory context. in so far, it goes without saying that the evolution and advancement of the Industrial Revolution reenforcemented and fed by the bourgeois elements is not merely materialistic and economic in its ramifications but does also have commensurate political ramifications. The middle class has not done off with the formal exploitative forces like feudalism and patriarchy to create an high-minded world but has rather done so to remove all challenge and resistance to its advancement and growth. The middle class system and notion of economic growth simply cannot survive and expand without causing turmoil and disturba nce in the instruments of production and the relations of production. Hence, as expected, the rise of the bourgeoisie has done a right smart with all the hitherto existing notions of national industries thereby annihilating all the localized notions of belonging and allegiance. Yet, the jeering of the matter is that the bourgeoisie concept of growth is not merely control to profit accrual and limited domination. In contrast, the bourgeoisie intends to perpetuate its domination by remolding the existing socio-economic and politico-cultural structures as per ones reverie and interests. Hence to extend a material and political form to such vision and ideals, it is imperative for the bourgeoisie to compress and coagulate all sources and forms of production, leading to the unchallenged concentration of property in few hands. That way it gets easier for the bourgeoisie to retain a grip over the things and to perpetuate ones advancement and pattern in the times to come. The existing fe udal relations and frameworks of property holding were simply not in consonance with the bourgeoisie intentions. Hence, they were systematically dismantled and set aside. In their turn out, the bourgeoisie put in place a seemingly just provision of free competition, while doing its best to twist the political and kindly norms to be in alignment with the essence of free competition. Yet, what went wrong with this change is that while molding the world to its vision, the bourgeoisie also brought into existence its own nemesis that is the modern working class. The bourgeoisie commoditized tire as any other factor of production. It homogenized labor by resorting to the mechanization of all modes of production. Yet the labor class created by the bourgeoisie is bound to emerge victorious very early, helped and aided by the existing technology and infrastructure created by the bourgeoisie. In its rift with the aristocratic classes, the bourgeoisie tends to solicit the support of labor. This not only gives recognition to the working class but makes it a magnet for the other marginalized and sidelined sections of the society. As the working class emerges into an essential bourgeoisie platform, it starts seeing the institutions set by the bourgeoisie like morality, law, and godliness as simply the tools of extending the vested bourgeoisie interests.