'Comparative Commentary on Global Warming Essay\r'

'â€Å"Taking be phone numberiveion to center greenho part gas emissions” (â€Å" school text A”), an human existencewide newspaper advertizing from Exxon Mobil and â€Å"An Agenda for humour body process” ( textbook B”), a spoken speech by Eileen Claussen, the chairman of church bench Center on Global Climate qualifying were ii written in 2006 with the concentrate on global warm up. The author in both commentaries strives to re bring out out the depicted object that as kind beings, we must throw action to stop the declension of climate throw. textbook A is a print article by a high society that emphasizes that e re every(prenominal)y champion in the world should be able to bespeak variance in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and that illustrates the incline of actions, in particular technological advances the association has interpreted to address the problem. As for school text B, it is a speech delivered to university stud ents that identifies the ultimate produce of the problems of climatic change the world is facing now. Even though the heart and soul of the devil texts is the same, the way they convey it differs, in cost of the organise and content, language usage, purpose, and narrative perspective.\r\nThe structure and content of the dickens texts atomic number 18 very similar even though on that point atomic number 18 some obvious differences. First, the ledger entry of the dickens texts is very similar in terms of the message their text strives to bring out. textbook A starts with â€Å"We’d like to use this space to parcel our thoughts on actions to address the risk of climate change” while schoolbook B is slightly incompatible as it opens with a courteous introduction premier(prenominal) off but what follows is this, â€Å"I am present now to chew out or so what climate change solutions efficiency necessitate”. This clear trys that even though the ii introductions i.e. the words used and the focus ara ar not the exact same, but without doubts, they ar think for the same purpose, to persuade people to take action.\r\nAs for the sentencing and separate style, both be written in sm totally paragraphs with long sentences, each having a unique(predicate) point to discharge. In text edition A, the 4th paragraph is approximately the need to develop new approaches that are suitable for consumers and to meliorate the present economic attitude and current living standard. The 7th paragraph is slightly the company up(p) energy efficiency and having trim a lot of emission. In textual matter B, the tertiary paragraph states the major cause for climate change, which is environmentally unfriendly actions done by humans. In the fifth paragraph, it duologue about how the rate of mountain glaciers melt down is increasing rapidly. These voices show that each paragraph from the 2 texts has a specific point to make and is clearly structured.\r\nDifferences can also be put up payable to the divers(prenominal) nature of the texts, school text A being an international newspaper advertisement that promotes their company, Exxon Mobil while school text B is a speech by Eileen Clausen in the Yale University with the aim to raise awareness of global heat to ring the bell that everyone must come together and take a â€Å"comprehensive approach”. First, they use different ways to inform their audiences.  Text A is presented with descriptions and actual statistics of the actions the company possess been taking so as to promote their company while Text B is a speech that strives to deliver the message to the audience that climate change is a undecomposed problem, so uses to a greater extent than examples and easy-to-understand facts and information such(prenominal) as how the pictorial phenomenon that are occurring now is just â€Å"the diadem of an scrapberg”.\r\nSecond, the wa y they start differ. For instance, Text B starts with a sentence in the very bloodline that Text A does not, which is â€Å"Thank you very much.  It is rub to be here at Yale University”. This is because Text B is a speech so it must show some kind of gratitude for being able to go past out a speech. In contrary, Text A is single an advertisement, which does not need to show gratitude that way, however, it has more(prenominal) to do with refinement. The tone of Text A is very formal and serious but not demanding because they are trying to promote their company. Although the tone in Text B has a certain level of distressfulness, it is more towards the friendly-conversation kind of feeling. It is presented like how close the audience and Eileen Clausen are, this is so that the audience would be more interested and take account of the global issues more.\r\nThe data of the dickens texts are not the same. Text A talks about solutions to compact green house g as emissions, â€Å"works with vehicle manufacturers and engine makers on programmers that could improve discharge economy by as much as 30% while significantly reducing emissions” and â€Å"improving energy efficiency at our facilities Steps taken since 1999 resulted in CO2 emissions saving of 11 one million million million tones in 2005…” In Text B”, it talks about the risks that human activities have brought upon climate change. For instance,” what they showed is that the act largest land-based ice sheet in the world is losing ice twice as fast” and â€Å"we know that hurricanes are becoming more intense, not just in the Atlantic which gave us Katrina and Rita…”The information used in each of the texts to convey its message is different.\r\nSince Text A is an advertisement for its own company, it would be very rare for it not to pressure its audience into buying its products. Exxon fluent does this by firing all the actions i t has taken to acquire the problem of climatic change, creating the impression that using or buying their products is one of the ways to save the planet. However, since Text B is exactly a speech with no special interest, it only needs to address the seriousness of the situation without pressuring the audience that â€Å"these, if I whitethorn presuppose this, are just the tip of the melting berg”, implying that what was said is not all that there is to it, there are numerous more risks out there. With and without the pressure, it shows how different the texts are and their impacts on the audience.\r\nAs between the two texts, one focuses on solutions while another one on risks. Text A focuses on the solutions the company has come up with while Text B talks about the risks caused by human activities. In addendum to that, Text A focuses on economic science solutions while Text B focuses on geographic problems. For instance, in â€Å"Text A”, phrases such as  "allow continued economic growth and improvements in living standard. Technological advances will be detailed”highlight the economic aspects and developing technology to improve living stand requires money, so it is indirectly communicate its customers to use or buy the company’s products. In Text B, the risks talked about are all related to the changes geographicly not economic risks, such as â€Å"loss of mountain glaciers”, â€Å"but in all oceans where hurricanes occur” and â€Å"One study found that 130 species-both plants and animals- have responded to earlier spring warming over the last 30 years.”\r\nIn addition to that, Text A focuses on proceedings while Text B on problem.  In Text A, the sentence, â€Å" working with vehicle manufacturers and engine makers on programmes that could improve raise economy by as much as 30% while significantly reducing emissions” shows an achievement because by working with other manufacturer s and company, Exxon Mobile would be able to benefit the fuel economy as well as reduce emissions. In Text B, the sentence,” we also know that we are experiencing a intercontinental loss of mountain glaciers, a trend that is accelerating. By mid-century, most mountain glaciers may be gone,” reveals a problem. Hence, the focus of each Text is different although they bring out the same message.\r\nAlthough both texts talks about reducing emissions, Text A, â€Å"Our scientists and engineers are working to reduce emissions today and in Text B, â€Å"We need to live from an economy based on burning of fossil fuels to one based on energy efficiency.” Text A is more prone to the side of benefiting their consumers â€Å" and Text B is prone to talk about the cause of global warming â€Å"The impacts of climate change crossways the globe are occurring in patters that can only explained by human activities and not by natural variations in regional climate.”\r\ nThe ultimate message that the two texts have differs, Text A if to promote their company and to persuade customers to do something therefore buy their product. Text B is to persuade people that we must take action to prevent the worsening of climatic change. This is shown by the conclusions which it also includes the use of technical words, even though both texts use 1st person as narrative perspective to express their information, at first in Text A, the use of â€Å"we” was to represent the totally Exxon Mobil â€Å"We’d like to use this space to voice our thoughts on actions” but it changed to a â€Å"we”, which meant the society and themselves â€Å"We all have a role to play.”\r\nInitially, in Text A, the use of â€Å"I” was to represent the speaker, the president of Pew Center on Global Climate Change â€Å"I am here today to talk about what climate change solutions might entail” but it literally changed to â€Å"We”, again it includes everyone â€Å"We need to act now to cone up with ways to settle emissions growth without.” The switch of the technical words emphasizes the message that wants to be sent across so they make everyone as a whole, make them think they are involved and would have consideration on whether to act or not.\r\nThe people targeted by each exposition are different. For Text A, since it is a published advertisement of a company, a profit-making company, to be specific, the targeted audience undeniably would be its customers (the public) in the sense that buying their products would get to saving the planet. In contrast, â€Å"Text B” has a narrower focus on university students â€Å"It is great to be here at Yale University”, people of high intellect and education, so explanation is not needed, therefore the message are more straightforwardly expressed.\r\nHowever, on a more in-depth analysis of the content of their commentary as discussed above, it ma y be that Text B is able to rack up a wider audience than Text A. The reason is that the language used in Text B is easier to understand, contains more common, day-to-day language, for example â€Å"The earth is warming; the impacts-once only predictions- are now upon us and are in all likelihood to worsen,” whereas almost half of the Text A in fact involves technical language, for example â€Å"Exxon Mobil is the lead helper and study areas include solar, hydrogen, biofuels and advanced transportation,” which can be thought to be targeting at people such as professors, university students, climate change ambassadors, engineers, surveyors, etc.\r\nIn conclusion, Text A and Text B have many similarities and differences between the content and language usage, for example the ultimate message, talking about risks or solutions, geographical problems or economy problems, technical language and tone etc. There are also many other differences and similarities that havenâ⠂¬â„¢t been mentioned such as the Text A inform in present continuous, Text B is repetitive and does not patronize, mountain chain (broad or limited, modern or historical) etc. Lastly, the two texts clearly convey the same theme with the description of solutions and risks, to take action for climate change.\r\n'